BNB PLUS CORP. BNBX (last ticker on record)
CIK 744452Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jul 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Oct 2025 to Jul 2026
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPFirst linked Oct 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Oct 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Harter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- LAW OFFICE OF ANDREA CATANEO LTD.First linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.37× · Went dark 2.15× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Schulte LLP | Oct 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Oct 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Harter Secrest & Emery LLP | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.35 | 0.33 | 0.70 |
| Norton Rose | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| LAW OFFICE OF ANDREA CATANEO LTD. | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 3.37 | 2.15 | 1.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Margaret K. RhodaHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Jan 2026 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Alexander R. McCleanHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- JOSEPH F. DANIELSLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Merrill M. KrainesFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Andrea CataneoSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Marc J. RossSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Michael FerenceSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 1.68× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margaret K. RhodaHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Jan 2026 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Alexander R. McCleanHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| JOSEPH F. DANIELSLoeb & Loeb LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Merrill M. KrainesFulbright & Jaworski | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 2.16 | 0.94 | 1.47 |
| Andrea CataneoSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Nov 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 75 | 1.32 | 1.36 | 1.18 |
| Marc J. RossSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 155 | 1.34 | 1.96 | 1.19 |
| Michael FerenceSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 44 | 1.75 | 1.68 | 1.44 |
| Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 190 | 1.27 | 1.93 | 1.29 |