MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS INC MXIM (last ticker on record)
CIK 743316Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2020 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Sep 2020 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Cooley LLP | Feb 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jenna E. LevineWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.33×
- Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Craig W. AdasWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Richard CapeloutoSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- James R. JonesCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jenna E. LevineWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.33 |
| Mark GordonWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2021 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Craig W. AdasWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLP | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Richard CapeloutoSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| James R. JonesCooley LLP | Feb 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 |