XETA TECHNOLOGIES INC XETA (last ticker on record)
CIK 742550Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C.First linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- LeClairRyan A Professional CorporationFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Phillips LytleFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEYFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bingham McCutchen | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Bryan Cave | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| FLASTER/GREENBERG P.C. | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| K&L Gates | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| LeClairRyan A Professional Corporation | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 93 | 0.77 | 0.42 | 1.10 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Phillips Lytle | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 22 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| White & Case | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Mayer Brown | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian T. GallagherFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kevin K. GreensladeHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard J. ParrinoHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian T. Gallagher | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Kevin K. GreensladeHogan Lovells US LLP | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 21 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard J. ParrinoHogan & Hartson | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 23 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 1.10 |