CADENCE FINANCIAL CORP CADE (last ticker on record)
CIK 742054Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jackson Walker L.L.P.First linked Jun 2009 · Named in a filing · 158 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Watkins Ludlam Winter & StennisFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Adams and ReeseFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Phelps DunbarFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jackson Walker L.L.P. | Jun 2009 | Named in a filing | 158 | 1.10 | 0.81 | 1.39 |
| Watkins Ludlam Winter & Stennis | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 32 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Porter & Hedges | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Adams and Reese | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.78 | 0.43 | 1.55 |
| Phelps Dunbar | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 48 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert C. SchwartzSmith, Gambrell & Russell, LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Mark L. JonesBaker & HostetlerFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.74×
- Virginia BouletAdams and ReeseFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert C. SchwartzSmith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Mark L. JonesBaker & Hostetler | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.74 |
| Virginia BouletAdams and Reese | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 0.64 |