CONCORD EFS INC CE (last ticker on record)
CIK 740112Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kutak RockFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- LATHROP & GAGE LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Gordon Hughes & BanksFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Wyatt Tarrant & CombsFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kutak Rock | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 123 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Holland & Hart | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| LATHROP & GAGE LLP | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.32 | 0.88 | 0.52 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Sidley Austin | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Bingham Dana | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Faegre & Benson | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Gordon Hughes & Banks | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 0.86 | 1.16 | 1.39 |
| Duane Morris | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Brown & Wood | May 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Wyatt Tarrant & Combs | May 2001 | Text search only | 53 | 1.40 | 0.35 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Aug 2008 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard A. FenyesSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Aug 2008 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |