OHIO POWER CO
CIK 73986Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2013 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 2013 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked May 2013 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Dewey & LeBoeuf LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunton & Williams | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Sidley Austin | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Jun 2013 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP | May 2013 | Text search only | 67 | 0.63 | 0.54 | 1.07 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 2013 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | May 2013 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 126 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Brown & Wood | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David C. HouseFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 9.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William E. JohnsonFirst linked Mar 2018 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 11.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- E. N. Ellis IVHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 9.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas G. BerkemeyerFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 6.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Vincent Pagano Jr.Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David C. House | Mar 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 9.34 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William E. Johnson | Mar 2018 | Named in a filing | 8 | 11.87 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| E. N. Ellis IVHunton & Williams | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 9.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas G. Berkemeyer | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 6.60 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Vincent Pagano Jr.Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.50 |