WASHINGTON TRUST BANCORP INC WASH (last ticker on record)
CIK 737468Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Partridge Snow & HahnFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.39×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Edwards & AngellFirst linked Aug 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 81 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Partridge Snow & Hahn | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 4.39 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Brown Rudnick | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Edwards & Angell | Aug 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 81 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Samantha M. KirbyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James P. BarriGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Paul W. LeeGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Philip J. FlinkBrown RudnickFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha M. KirbyGoodwin Procter | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James P. BarriGoodwin Procter | Oct 2008 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Paul W. LeeGoodwin Procter | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Philip J. FlinkBrown Rudnick | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 |