COVER ALL TECHNOLOGIES INC COVR (last ticker on record)
CIK 737300Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Sills Cummis & GrossFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Reid & Priest LLPFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epstein Becker & Green | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Sills Cummis & Gross | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.93 |
| DLA Piper | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
| Reid & Priest LLP | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.38 | 0.67 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David E. WeissDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Leonard GubarReid & Priest LLPFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David E. WeissDLA Piper | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Leonard GubarReid & Priest LLP | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.50 |