IDENTIX INC IDNX (last ticker on record)
CIK 735780Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Choate Hall & StewartFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Briggs and Morgan, P.A.First linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.76× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Choate Hall & Stewart | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 142 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 1.29 |
| Briggs and Morgan, P.A. | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.47 | 1.76 | 1.00 |
| Maslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 88 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 1.52 |
| Heller Ehrman | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Morrison & Foerster | May 2002 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- PHILIP J. TILTONMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Marina RemennikCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Richard A. PeersHeller EhrmanFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHILIP J. TILTONMaslon Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Marina RemennikCooley LLP | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.47 | 2.49 | 1.03 |
| Richard A. PeersHeller Ehrman | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 2.24 |
| Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 190 | 1.27 | 1.93 | 1.29 |