SILVERADO GOLD MINES LTD SLGLF (last ticker on record)
CIK 731727Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- W.L. MACDONALD LAW CORPORATIONFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Lang Michener LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- O Neill & TaylorFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W.L. MACDONALD LAW CORPORATION | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 75 | 1.23 | 1.84 | 1.49 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Lang Michener LLP | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 90 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.01 |
| O Neill & Taylor | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.69 | 1.26 | 2.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William L. MacdonaldClark Wilson LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Mark Y. AbdouRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 2.72× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Michael H. TaylorLang Michener LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 68 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Leslie L. KapusianykFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William L. MacdonaldClark Wilson LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 92 | 0.80 | 1.39 | 0.96 |
| Mark Y. AbdouRichardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2006 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.35 | 2.72 | 0.86 |
| Erick RichardsonRichardson & Patel LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.68 | 1.64 | 1.72 |
| Michael H. TaylorLang Michener LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 68 | 1.40 | 1.14 | 0.90 |
| Leslie L. Kapusianyk | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.47 | 1.33 | 1.12 |