ZYGO CORP ZIGO (last ticker on record)
CIK 730716Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Fish & RichardsonFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 2.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Fish & Richardson | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 37 | 0.93 | 1.30 | 2.73 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Todd E. LensonStroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Manuel G. RiveraNorton RoseFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Sheldon G. NussbaumFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 4.71× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- PAUL JACOBSFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd E. LensonStroock & Stroock & Lavan | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Manuel G. RiveraNorton Rose | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Sheldon G. NussbaumFulbright & Jaworski | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.70 | 4.71 | 0.00 |
| PAUL JACOBSFulbright & Jaworski | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 2.22 |