REPLIGEN CORP RGEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 730272Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stuart M. CableGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2026 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Jacqueline MercierGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Robert E. PuopoloGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Lawrence S. WittenbergGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter | Aug 2026 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Jacqueline MercierGoodwin Procter | Aug 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin Procter | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Robert E. PuopoloGoodwin Procter | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Lawrence S. WittenbergGoodwin Procter | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.44 | 0.95 | 1.56 |