ILLINI CORP ILIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 730037Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Williams & ConnollyFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Howard and HowardFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- Olive LLP.First linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Williams & Connolly | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Howard and Howard | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 38 | 0.28 | 0.47 | 0.37 |
| Olive LLP. | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Schiff Hardin | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph T. Porter Jr.Polsinelli White Vardeman & ShaltonFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joseph B. HemkerHoward and HowardFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Theodore L. EissfeldtHoward and HowardFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Timothy E. KraepelHoward and HowardFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Christopher J. ZinskiSchiff HardinFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph T. Porter Jr.Polsinelli White Vardeman & Shalton | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joseph B. HemkerHoward and Howard | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Theodore L. EissfeldtHoward and Howard | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Timothy E. KraepelHoward and Howard | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 16 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Christopher J. ZinskiSchiff Hardin | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |