NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
CIK 72909Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2002
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Gardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley & Lardner | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Gardner Carton & Douglas | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Jones Day | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James L. AltmanFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert J. JosephHusch BlackwellFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John D. WilsonKing & SpaldingFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- PETER D. CLARKEGardner Carton & DouglasFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James L. Altman | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert J. JosephHusch Blackwell | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John D. WilsonKing & Spalding | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| PETER D. CLARKEGardner Carton & Douglas | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |