KENT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS INC KENT (last ticker on record)
CIK 728478Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.86 | 1.08 | 0.92 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Pillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 117 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 1.16 |
| Cooley LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Guy P. LanderCarter Ledyard & Milburn LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Andrew M. TuckerNelson MullinsFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- CARRIE L. SCHIFFCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.68× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Andrea VachssCooley LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guy P. LanderCarter Ledyard & Milburn LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Andrew M. TuckerNelson Mullins | Aug 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| CARRIE L. SCHIFFCooley LLP | Feb 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 2.68 | 0.00 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Andrea VachssCooley LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.88 |