IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.
CIK 728391Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Oct 2011 · Named in a filing · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked May 2024 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Bingham Greenebaum DollFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- White & CaseFirst linked Sep 2015 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Oct 2011 · Text search only · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes & Thornburg | Oct 2011 | Named in a filing | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | May 2024 | Text search only | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| Winston & Strawn | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Bingham Greenebaum Doll | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 20 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| White & Case | Sep 2015 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Oct 2011 | Text search only | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Mayer Brown | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph S. PayneDavis PolkFirst linked May 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph S. PayneDavis Polk | May 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |