iSign Solutions Inc. ISIGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 727634Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Baer Marks & UphamFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Oct 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Baer Marks & Upham | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.89 | 1.31 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexandra F. CalcadoPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 13.30× · 95% wipeout 5.83×
- Michael C. PhillipsMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Michael McArthur-PhillipsDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Oct 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Jonathan J. RussoPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 1.76× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- David C. BacaDavis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.58× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- David GonzalezFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandra F. CalcadoPillsbury Winthrop | Dec 2015 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 13.30 | 5.83 |
| Michael C. PhillipsMorrison & Foerster | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.49 | 0.92 | 0.50 |
| Michael McArthur-PhillipsDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | Oct 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.56 | 1.77 | 1.05 |
| Jonathan J. RussoPillsbury Winthrop | Nov 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.26 | 1.76 | 1.18 |
| David C. BacaDavis Wright Tremaine LLP | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 0.89 |
| David Gonzalez | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 91 | 1.34 | 1.69 | 0.76 |