MERCHANTS BANCSHARES INC MBVT (last ticker on record)
CIK 726517Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Primmer Piper Eggleston & Cramer PCFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2015 · Text search only · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Primmer Piper Eggleston & Cramer PC | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Bingham Dana | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Jul 2015 | Text search only | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew P. AlinCadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Samantha M. KirbyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William P. MayerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew P. AlinCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Samantha M. KirbyGoodwin Procter | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William P. MayerGoodwin Procter | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.00 |