PC GROUP, INC. PCGR (last ticker on record)
CIK 725460Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kane Kessler, P.C.First linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Kaufman & Moomjian, LLCFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 5.80× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- K&L GatesFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kane Kessler, P.C. | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.27 | 1.59 | 0.98 |
| Kaufman & Moomjian, LLC | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.10 | 5.80 | 1.73 |
| K&L Gates | May 2005 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Stikeman Elliott | May 2005 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert L. LawrenceKane Kessler, P.C.First linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Gary T. MoomjianMoomjian Waite & ColemanFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 4.57× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Jeffrey S. TullmanKane Kessler, P.C.First linked May 2005 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert L. LawrenceKane Kessler, P.C. | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.35 | 0.99 | 1.01 |
| Gary T. MoomjianMoomjian Waite & Coleman | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.58 | 4.57 | 0.81 |
| Jeffrey S. TullmanKane Kessler, P.C. | May 2005 | Text search only | 15 | 1.70 | 1.51 | 0.34 |