PAYCHEX INC PAYX (last ticker on record)
CIK 723531Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Harter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Woods Oviatt GilmanFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Mar 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Harter Secrest & Emery LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.35 | 0.33 | 0.70 |
| Nixon Peabody | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Woods Oviatt Gilman | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.57 | 1.71 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- James M. JenkinsHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Justin P. DoyleNixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Herbert J. HuffFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | Mar 2025 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| James M. JenkinsHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Justin P. DoyleNixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle LLP | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Herbert J. Huff | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 38 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 |