COMMUNITY FINANCIAL SYSTEM, INC. CBU (last ticker on record)
CIK 723188Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Hinman Howard & KattellFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Dilworth Paxson LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Bond Schoeneck & KingFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Hinman Howard & Kattell | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Dilworth Paxson LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.96 | 1.58 | 1.04 |
| Brown & Wood | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Bond Schoeneck & King | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew P. AlinCadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.24 |