SAVIENT PHARMACEUTICALS INC SVNT (last ticker on record)
CIK 722104Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Nov 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Apr 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| HALE AND DORR | Aug 2006 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Apr 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian A. JohnsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Jason L. KroppWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Hal J. LeibowitzWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Roy L. GoldmanFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 5.02× · 95% wipeout 2.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian A. JohnsonWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Jason L. KroppWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2008 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Hal J. LeibowitzWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| David E. RedlickWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 1.24 | 0.33 | 1.01 |
| Roy L. GoldmanFulbright & Jaworski | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.44 | 5.02 | 2.98 |