TERRA INDUSTRIES INC TRA (last ticker on record)
CIK 722079Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Oct 2004 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Aug 2001 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- SCOTT N. GIERKEFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.23×
- HARTZOG CONGER & CASONFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Ballard Spahr | Oct 2004 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Piper Rudnick | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Aug 2001 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Sep 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| SCOTT N. GIERKE | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.84 | 0.00 | 2.23 |
| HARTZOG CONGER & CASON | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 11 | 2.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian W. DuweSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Richard C. Witzel Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Thomas E. DunnCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Timothy G. MassadCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Gerald T. NowakKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Carter W. EmersonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.77×
- Craig F. ArcellaCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian W. DuweSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Richard C. Witzel Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Thomas E. DunnCravath Swaine & Moore | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| Timothy G. MassadCravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2008 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Gerald T. NowakKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Carter W. EmersonKirkland & Ellis | Sep 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.78 | 0.00 | 3.77 |
| Craig F. ArcellaCravath Swaine & Moore | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 43 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.52 |