AMC ENTERTAINMENT INC AEN (last ticker on record)

CIK 722077Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Apr 2011
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 32; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 16; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Apr 1, 2011Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 19, 2009Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 12, 2007Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 6, 2005Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Apr 4, 2005Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 29, 2005Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 27, 2004Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	826	1.02	0.18	0.83
O Melveny & Myers LLP	Jul 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	589	1.07	0.25	1.07
Ropes & Gray	Apr 2006	Named in a filing	914	0.98	0.14	0.92
Holland & Knight	Mar 2005	Named in a filing	413	1.17	0.82	1.19
Nutter McClennen & Fish	Mar 2005	Named in a filing	88	0.75	0.47	0.85
Quarles & Brady	Mar 2005	Named in a filing	170	0.74	0.70	0.79
Latham & Watkins LLP	Sep 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Mar 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
LATHROP & GAGE LLP	Dec 2001	Named in a filing	50	0.32	0.88	0.52
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Dec 2001	Named in SEC correspondence	1,051	1.31	0.27	0.91
Cravath Swaine & Moore	Apr 1999	Named in a filing	839	1.29	0.03	0.85
Sullivan & Cromwell	Jul 1997	Named in a filing	1,047	1.40	0.15	0.69
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.	Apr 1997	Named in a filing	995	1.46	0.37	0.80
DLA Piper	Apr 2017	Text search only	1,184	1.00	0.45	1.20
Fulbright & Jaworski	May 2006	Text search only	359	1.10	0.75	1.35
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur LLP	May 2006	Text search only	67	0.63	0.54	1.07
Ballard Spahr	Apr 2006	Text search only	492	1.23	1.06	0.73
Choate Hall & Stewart	Apr 2006	Text search only	142	0.60	0.75	1.29
COHN BIRNBAUM & SHEA	Apr 2006	Text search only	9	2.30	0.00	2.20
Fried Frank	Apr 2006	Text search only	540	1.33	0.24	0.94
Hackman Hulett & Cracraft	Apr 2006	Text search only	9	0.00	0.00	0.00
HALE AND DORR	Apr 2006	Text search only	665	1.06	0.33	1.26
Kaye Scholer	Apr 2006	Text search only	161	0.88	1.03	1.00
Shearman & Sterling	Apr 2006	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Warner Norcross & Judd	Apr 2006	Text search only	60	1.36	0.00	1.06
WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING	Apr 2006	Text search only	662	1.14	0.33	1.26
Mayer Brown	Jan 2005	Text search only	680	0.98	0.34	0.94
Hughes Hubbard & Reed	Sep 2004	Text search only	121	1.17	0.21	1.26
Bingham Dana	Feb 2002	Text search only	104	1.37	0.54	1.14
Goulston & Storrs	Feb 2002	Text search only	86	0.90	0.34	1.33
Goodwin Procter	Jan 2002	Text search only	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Polsinelli White Vardeman & Shalton	Dec 2001	Text search only	5	2.95	0.00	0.00

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Aman SinghFenwick & West LLP	Jun 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	16	0.00	0.00	1.77
Corey R. ChiversWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Jun 2015	Named in SEC correspondence	38	1.63	0.00	1.48
Benjamin A. AronovitchPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	7	0.00	0.00	0.00
Tracey A. ZacconePaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	26	1.14	0.00	1.03
Monica K. ThurmondPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	May 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	32	0.46	0.00	1.06
Gregory A. EzringPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	Jan 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	55	0.35	0.00	1.07
David M. SchwartzbaumLatham & Watkins LLP	Sep 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	5	0.00	0.00	0.00
Howard L. EllinSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Sep 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	54	1.71	0.00	1.07
Samuel A. FishmanLatham & Watkins LLP	Sep 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	6	0.00	0.00	0.00
Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz	Jul 2004	Named in SEC correspondence	75	1.42	0.00	0.82
Eileen T. NugentSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Apr 2001	Named in SEC correspondence	19	1.48	0.00	0.35
Dennis D. LamontLatham & Watkins LLP	May 2006	Text search only	16	0.56	0.00	1.39
Christopher EwanFried Frank	Apr 2006	Text search only	29	0.70	0.88	0.00
David N. ShineFried Frank	Apr 2006	Text search only	9	0.98	0.00	1.13
Wallace E. BrockhoffLATHROP & GAGE LLP	Feb 2002	Text search only	5	1.45	0.00	0.00
Matthew D. BlochWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Dec 2001	Text search only	33	0.95	0.00	0.36