SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC SII (last ticker on record)
CIK 721083Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Aug 2010 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Gardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Aug 2010 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Haynes and Boone | Mar 2007 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Porter & Hedges | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 117 | 1.13 | 0.97 | 1.24 |
| Bracewell LLP | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- J. David Kirkland Jr.Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Aug 2010 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- ERIC A. BLUMROSENGardere Wynne Sewell LLPFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.26× · Went dark 5.37× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. David Kirkland Jr.Baker Botts L.L.P. | Aug 2010 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| David E. ShapiroWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| ERIC A. BLUMROSENGardere Wynne Sewell LLP | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.26 | 5.37 | 2.28 |