CALENERGY CO INC
CIK 720556Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Willkie Farr | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert M. Mattson Jr.Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Michael A. SchwartzWillkie FarrFirst linked Dec 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter J. HanlonWillkie FarrFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert M. Mattson Jr.Morrison & Foerster | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 0.93 |
| Michael A. SchwartzWillkie Farr | Dec 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter J. HanlonWillkie Farr | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |