AMTECH SYSTEMS INC ASYS (last ticker on record)
CIK 720500Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Pierce AtwoodFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Dec 2006 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Pierce Atwood | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Patton Boggs | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Shaw Pittman | Dec 2006 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher A. Van TuylSquire Sanders (US)First linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.95×
- Gregory R. HallDLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 2.02×
- Christopher D. JohnsonSquire Sanders (US)First linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 2.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher A. Van TuylSquire Sanders (US) | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 2.95 |
| Gregory R. HallDLA Piper | Sep 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.04 | 0.91 | 2.02 |
| Christopher D. JohnsonSquire Sanders (US) | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 2.14 |