HECLA MINING CO HL (last ticker on record)
CIK 719413Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Bell Boyd & LloydFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Lang Michener LLPFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassels Brock & Blackwell | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 102 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| K&L Gates | Apr 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Bell Boyd & Lloyd | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 1.36 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
| Ballard Spahr | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Lang Michener LLP | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 90 | 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- J. Craig WalkerK&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Craig WalkerK&L Gates | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.70 |