NEWMONT USA LTD
CIK 71824Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- King & WoodFirst linked Jul 2024 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.23 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| White & Case | Apr 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| King & Wood | Jul 2024 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David JohansenWhite & CaseFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Laura SizemoreWhite & CaseFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Maureen BrundageWhite & CaseFirst linked Apr 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David JohansenWhite & Case | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Laura SizemoreWhite & Case | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 108 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Maureen BrundageWhite & Case | Apr 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 |