ERICSSON LM TELEPHONE CO ERIC (last ticker on record)
CIK 717826Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Harter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harter Secrest & Emery LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 77 | 1.35 | 0.33 | 0.70 |
| K&L Gates | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexander R. McCleanHarter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Joshua Ford BonnieSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- David A. SirignanoMorgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- DAVID I. SCHILLERGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander R. McCleanHarter Secrest & Emery LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Joshua Ford BonnieSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| David A. SirignanoMorgan Lewis | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| DAVID I. SCHILLERGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.73 |