DRESS BARN INC DBRN (last ticker on record)
CIK 717724Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Willcox & SavageFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Willcox & Savage | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Proskauer Rose | Dec 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Henry O. Smith IIIProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 3.48× · 95% wipeout 3.01×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.38 |
| Henry O. Smith IIIProskauer Rose | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.06 | 3.48 | 3.01 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer Rose | Sep 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 1.31 |