CYPRESS BIOSCIENCE INC CYPB (last ticker on record)
CIK 716054Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Cooley LLP | Feb 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alison S. ResslerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Barbara L. BordenCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- David A. LipkinCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Matthew T. BrowneCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- D. Bradley PeckCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 1998 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Thomas A. CollCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Carl R. SanchezPaul HastingsFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Frederick T. MutoCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alison S. ResslerSullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Barbara L. BordenCooley LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| David A. LipkinCooley LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |
| Matthew T. BrowneCooley LLP | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| D. Bradley PeckCooley LLP | Oct 1998 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Thomas A. CollCooley LLP | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Carl R. SanchezPaul Hastings | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Frederick T. MutoCooley LLP | Feb 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 0.95 | 1.03 | 1.13 |