UNOCAL CORP UCL (last ticker on record)
CIK 716039Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Aug 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- HYNES & LERACHFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Young Conaway Stargatt & TaylorFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Aug 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.87 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Thompson & Knight | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| HYNES & LERACH | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 1.77 | 1.35 | 1.43 |
| MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNEL | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 17 | 3.17 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 36 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian M. WongPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- TERRY MICHAEL KEEPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- ELLIOTT V. STEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Douglas D. SmithGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Aug 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian M. WongPillsbury Winthrop | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| TERRY MICHAEL KEEPillsbury Winthrop | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| ELLIOTT V. STEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Douglas D. SmithGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Aug 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 0.91 |