INTERFACE INC TILE (last ticker on record)
CIK 715787Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Kilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- KILPATRICK & CODYFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.78×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kilpatrick Townsend | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 92 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 1.20 |
| Kilpatrick Stockton | Oct 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 191 | 0.88 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
| KILPATRICK & CODY | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 2.78 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David M. EatonKilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- James W. StevensKilpatrick TownsendFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- David A. StocktonKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- W. Randy EaddyKilpatrick StocktonFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David M. EatonKilpatrick Townsend | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| James W. StevensKilpatrick Townsend | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| David A. StocktonKilpatrick Stockton | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| W. Randy EaddyKilpatrick Stockton | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.00 |