PHARMOS CORP PARS (last ticker on record)
CIK 713275Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Eilenberg & Krause LLPFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- EILENBERG & ZIVIANFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 2.98× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Eilenberg & Krause LLP | Mar 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 2.12 | 1.61 | 1.83 |
| EILENBERG & ZIVIAN | Oct 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.12 | 2.98 | 1.81 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Melinda BrungerAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Adam D. EilenbergEilenberg & Krause LLPFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.82× · Went dark 5.87× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Ted ChastainEilenberg & Krause LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 5.93× · Went dark 2.32× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melinda BrungerAndrews Kurth LLP | Nov 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.62 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Adam D. EilenbergEilenberg & Krause LLP | Oct 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.82 | 5.87 | 1.24 |
| Ted ChastainEilenberg & Krause LLP | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 6 | 5.93 | 2.32 | 1.44 |