PROXIM WIRELESS CORP PRXM (last ticker on record)
CIK 712511Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Sep 2007 to Apr 2009
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley HoagFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLPFirst linked Sep 1999 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.19×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley Hoag | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.14 |
| Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP | Sep 1999 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.19 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William R. KolbFoley HoagFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- John D. HancockFoley HoagFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William R. KolbFoley Hoag | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| John D. HancockFoley Hoag | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.98 |