COOPER COMPANIES, INC. COO (last ticker on record)
CIK 711404Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Erica H. SteinbergerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.64×
- John M. NewellLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Robert A. ZuccaroLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Samuel A. FishmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Laura L. GabrielLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 54 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Erica H. SteinbergerLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 3.64 |
| John M. NewellLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Robert A. ZuccaroLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Samuel A. FishmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Laura L. GabrielLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.26 |