APPLIED MICRO CIRCUITS CORP AMCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 711065Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jan 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- VENTURE LAW GROUPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- McGlinchey StaffordFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Paul Hastings | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Cooley LLP | Dec 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| VENTURE LAW GROUP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.32 | 1.04 | 1.23 |
| McGlinchey Stafford | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 15 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.34 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan B. KalinMcCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLPFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Jorge del CalvoPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Jorge A. del CalvoPillsbury Madison & Sutro LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 3.69×
- Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Matthew T. BrowneCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Carl R. SanchezPaul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- D. Bradley PeckCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Glen R. Van LigtenOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.35×
- Mark A. MedearisVENTURE LAW GROUPFirst linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 3.39× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan B. KalinMcCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, LLP | Dec 2016 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Jorge del CalvoPillsbury Winthrop | Dec 2016 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.33 | 0.57 | 1.82 |
| Jorge A. del CalvoPillsbury Madison & Sutro LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.26 | 2.27 | 3.69 |
| Sean FellerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 43 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Matthew T. BrowneCooley LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Carl R. SanchezPaul Hastings | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 24 | 2.07 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| D. Bradley PeckCooley LLP | Dec 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Glen R. Van LigtenOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.53 | 0.00 | 2.35 |
| Mark A. MedearisVENTURE LAW GROUP | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.28 | 3.39 | 1.99 |