Fushi Copperweld, Inc. FSIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 710846Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Murtha CullinaFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Lewis and RocaFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Guzov OfsinkFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Aug 2012 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Murtha Cullina | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.26 | 0.89 | 1.26 |
| Lewis and Roca | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.25 | 1.60 | 1.33 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Guzov Ofsink | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 1.08 | 0.32 | 1.11 |
| Allen & Overy | Aug 2012 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David C. FischerLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Darren OfsinkGuzov OfsinkFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David C. FischerLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.09 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Darren OfsinkGuzov Ofsink | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 40 | 1.25 | 0.56 | 1.19 |