CAREMARK ULYSSES HOLDING CORP. UAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 709878Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dechert LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Pryor Cashman | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Willkie Farr | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gerald AdlerDechert LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Herbert J. HuffFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Mark S. BergmanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerald AdlerDechert LLP | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.71 | 1.12 | 1.16 |
| Raphael M. RussoPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Herbert J. Huff | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 38 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Mark S. BergmanPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.61 | 1.06 | 0.93 |