AMERICA WEST AIRLINES INC
CIK 706270Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vedder PriceFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Morris JamesFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vedder Price | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 144 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.94 |
| Morris James | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 95 | 1.62 | 0.42 | 0.86 |
| Cooley LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Todd A. HambletCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Samuel M. LivermoreCooley LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- DAVID BARBOURAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
- DAVID J. GRAHAMAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd A. HambletCooley LLP | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Samuel M. LivermoreCooley LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DAVID BARBOURAndrews Kurth LLP | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.96 |
| DAVID J. GRAHAMAndrews Kurth LLP | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John F. Kennedy | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |