Avid Bioservices, Inc. CDMO (last ticker on record)
CIK 704562Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2025 · Named in a filing · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- FALK SHAFF & ZIEBELLFirst linked Sep 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 3.05× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Jeffers, Shaff & Falk, LLPFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.07× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Luce Forward Hamilton & ScrippsFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Rutan & TuckerFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Stradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 165 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jul 2017 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | Feb 2025 | Named in a filing | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| K&L Gates | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| FALK SHAFF & ZIEBELL | Sep 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.63 | 3.05 | 1.09 |
| Jeffers, Shaff & Falk, LLP | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 12 | 3.07 | 1.89 | 1.27 |
| Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 80 | 0.85 | 1.20 | 0.90 |
| Rutan & Tucker | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 60 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 1.08 |
| Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 165 | 1.18 | 1.37 | 1.37 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jul 2017 | Text search only | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Bryan Cave | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Zachary BlumeRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2025 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Michael A. HedgeK&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- Otto E. SorensenLuce Forward Hamilton & ScrippsFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 4.15× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- THOMAS J. CRANERutan & TuckerFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Eric L. CohenBryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2002 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zachary BlumeRopes & Gray | Feb 2025 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.30 | 1.69 | 0.52 |
| Michael A. HedgeK&L Gates | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.98 | 0.77 | 1.98 |
| Otto E. SorensenLuce Forward Hamilton & Scripps | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.85 | 4.15 | 1.00 |
| THOMAS J. CRANERutan & Tucker | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Eric L. CohenBryan Cave | Sep 2002 | Text search only | 8 | 0.86 | 1.75 | 2.58 |