SOMANETICS CORP SMTS (last ticker on record)
CIK 704328Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jan 2004 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Varnum LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Piper Rudnick | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Varnum LLP | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 48 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph L. Johnson IIIGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Charles M. NathanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Patrick T. DuerrHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph L. Johnson IIIGoodwin Procter | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Charles M. NathanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Patrick T. DuerrHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 2.02 |