Aramark Services, Inc. VSTS-WI (last ticker on record)
CIK 7032Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 245 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- McCarter & EnglishFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 141 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.17 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Allen & Overy | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 245 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 0.63 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Stoel Rives | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.15 |
| McCarter & English | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 141 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph KaufmanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph KaufmanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.88 |