TENET HEALTHCARE CORP THC (last ticker on record)
CIK 70318Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began May 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Jan 2004 to Mar 2009
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Woodburn and WedgeFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Woodburn and Wedge | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 62 | 1.51 | 1.15 | 1.12 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barbara L. BeckerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Gregg P. BarnardWoodburn and WedgeFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Henry HavreAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- NICHOLAS P. SAGGESEHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Kirk S. SchumacherWoodburn and WedgeFirst linked Nov 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 3.63×
- Alison S. ResslerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Brian J. McCarthySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Thomas C. JansonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.23×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara L. BeckerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Andrew L. FabensGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Gregg P. BarnardWoodburn and Wedge | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.66 | 0.39 | 1.30 |
| Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Henry HavreAndrews Kurth LLP | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| NICHOLAS P. SAGGESEHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Kirk S. SchumacherWoodburn and Wedge | Nov 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.07 | 1.38 | 3.63 |
| Alison S. ResslerSullivan & Cromwell | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.84 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Brian J. McCarthySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Thomas C. JansonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 2.23 |
| John F. Kennedy | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |