SHELL CANADA LTD
CIK 702983Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Bennett JonesFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Ogilvy RenaultFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Jones DayFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Bennett Jones | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.29 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Ogilvy Renault | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 53 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Jones Day | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William P. Rogers Jr.Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William P. Rogers Jr.Cravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 33 | 0.46 | 0.78 | 0.84 |