NDCHEALTH CORP NDC (last ticker on record)
CIK 70033Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Aug 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Alston & Bird | Aug 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- MARY A. BERNARDKing & SpaldingFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
- Laura G. ThatcherAlston & BirdFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Mark F. McElreathAlston & BirdFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- David E. Brown Jr.Alston & BirdFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARY A. BERNARDKing & Spalding | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 2.08 |
| Laura G. ThatcherAlston & Bird | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 45 | 0.83 | 1.24 | 1.06 |
| Mark F. McElreathAlston & Bird | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| David E. Brown Jr.Alston & Bird | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 |