NASH FINCH CO NAFC (last ticker on record)
CIK 69671Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2003
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Warner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLPFirst linked Jul 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warner Norcross & Judd | Oct 2013 | Named in a filing | 60 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Oppenheimer Wolff & Donnelly LLP | Jul 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey A. LetalienGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- David W. PollakMorgan LewisFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Rohan S. WeerasingheShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- John A. HavemanFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey A. LetalienGoodwin Procter | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| David W. PollakMorgan Lewis | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Rohan S. WeerasingheShearman & Sterling | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| John A. HavemanFaegre Baker Daniels | Oct 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.92 |