ENERPAC TOOL GROUP CORP EPAC (last ticker on record)
CIK 6955Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2026 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Helen R. Friedli, P.C.First linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2026 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Foley & Lardner | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Helen R. Friedli, P.C. | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.70 | 1.41 | 0.80 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Quarles & Brady | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Mayer Brown | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Nixon Peabody | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Holland & Hart | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sidley Austin | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ana SemperteguiKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2026 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- David A. HarrisMorris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Joseph D. MastersonQuarles & BradyFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Bruce C. DavidsonQuarles & BradyFirst linked Mar 1998 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Eric S. HaueterSidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana SemperteguiKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2026 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| David A. HarrisMorris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Eric OrsicMcDermott Will & Emery | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Joseph D. MastersonQuarles & Brady | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Bruce C. DavidsonQuarles & Brady | Mar 1998 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Eric S. HaueterSidley Austin | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 18 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 |