MTS SYSTEMS CORP MTSC (last ticker on record)
CIK 68709Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.First linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Gray Plant Mooty Mooty & BennettFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.First linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Lindquist & VennumFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 101 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 154 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 1.07 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Gray Plant Mooty Mooty & Bennett | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 43 | 1.17 | 1.19 | 1.25 |
| Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.96 | 0.63 | 1.44 |
| Lindquist & Vennum | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 101 | 0.97 | 0.44 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Amanda K. LorentzFredrikson & Byron, P.A.First linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey A. ShermanFaegre & BensonFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & BensonFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda K. LorentzFredrikson & Byron, P.A. | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey A. ShermanFaegre & Benson | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.79 | 1.61 | 1.21 |
| W. Morgan BurnsFaegre & Benson | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.28 |